New data reveals credit unions over $5B spend 3x more on marketing than smaller peers—and the gap is widening. Here’s how prescreen marketing lets community FIs compete on precision rather than budget size.
Relationship-based referrals feel good but leave loan growth to chance. Learn how prescreen marketing transforms passive goodwill into predictable, data-driven member acquisition.
New research shows customers value behind-the-scenes AI 19% more than front-facing features. Here’s what that means for community FI lending strategy and prescreen marketing.
Credit unions are absorbing more credit risk than banks—by design, not distress. Learn how to convert this counter-cyclical strategy into funded loans through proactive borrower acquisition.
The most valuable thing prescreen campaign analytics can do is tell you where you’re winning and where you’re wasting money. A review of aggregated weighted campaign performance data across offer types and campaign audiences reveals a clear pattern — one that holds up under a consistent evidence standard, and contains one finding that should change how credit unions think about member acquisition.
Market share is defined as your institution’s closed loans in a given product category divided by the total loans closed in that category across all competing institutions serving the same population that received your firm offer of credit. Conversion rate measures what your campaign did in isolation. The two can move in opposite directions — and when they do, conversion rate is wrong.
| Campaign 1 | Campaign 2 | |
|---|---|---|
| Offers Sent | 1,000 | 1,000 |
| Your Loans Closed | 20 | 25 |
| Total Market Closings | 200 | 500 |
| Campaign 1 | Campaign 2 | |
|---|---|---|
| Offers Sent | 800 | 600 |
| Your Loans Closed | 24 | 15 |
| Total Market Closings | 120 | 50 |
Most institutions evaluate campaign performance with conversion rate: the number of members or prospects who responded to an offer divided by the number of offers sent. It’s intuitive, easy to compute, and almost entirely useless as a measure of competitive improvement.
Conversion rate measures what your campaign did. Market share — defined here as your institution’s closed loans in a given product category divided by the total loans closed in that category across all competing institutions serving the same population that received your firm offer of credit — measures how you performed relative to everyone else competing for the same borrowers at the same time. Institutional competitiveness is a relative concept, not an absolute one. A credit union’s goal is not to convert more offers; it is to win a larger share of the lending market it operates in. Market share is the only metric that directly measures that.
The distinction matters because conversion rate and market share can move in opposite directions — and when they do, conversion rate produces a false signal as described in the illustration above.
All findings in this analysis are expressed in market share terms. Conversion rate appears only where it is arithmetically necessary to derive market share from reported data.
To separate reliable signal from noise, findings here require a minimum of 24 total sales — target and other product combined — on both the existing and prospective side before any comparison is treated as actionable. That threshold eliminates most of the data. Five bilateral comparisons survive it. A separate disclosure applies to mortgage new purchase, explained below.
Aggregated weighted campaign data across participating credit unions and community banks. Minimum evidence threshold: 24 total sales (target + other) on both existing and prospective sides. Five bilateral comparisons survive. Market share = institution’s closed loans ÷ all loans closed among the same prescreened population.
Across all campaigns in the dataset, existing member campaigns capture 25.7% weighted market share versus 1.6% for prospective campaigns — a 16.5x gap supported by more than 3,200 total sales in existing campaigns and more than 2,200 in prospective ones. Every product-level finding that follows sits within this frame.
Personal and consumer loans are the strongest finding in the dataset. Existing member PCL campaigns capture 56.1% market share — nearly 1,000 total sales — while prospective PCL campaigns capture 2.2% on more than 200 total sales. More than half of existing members who enter the personal loan market chose their credit union. Fewer than 1 in 40 prospects did. No other bilateral comparison is this well-supported.
Auto loan refinance is the highest-volume comparison available. With 563 total existing sales and 1,225 prospective, the 32.0% versus 2.0% gap is the most statistically reliable finding in the data. ALR is also the only prospective product with a large enough sample to model cost-per-acquisition with genuine confidence.
Auto loan extensions show the same structural pattern at 19.3% existing versus 1.1% prospective across 424 and 662 total sales respectively. The relationship advantage is real, reproducible, and not dependent on small-sample luck.
Home equity products confirm the same direction — 22.0% existing versus 1.9% prospective — though both sample sizes just clear the minimum at 33 and 42 total sales. The direction is credible; the specific figures warrant more caution than the loan products above.
Mortgage new purchase is the most strategically significant finding in the dataset, and the one that requires the most careful reading. Existing member MNP campaigns show 4.3% market share; prospective MNP campaigns show 3.2%. The gap is 1.3x — compared to 12–25x for every other validated product.
Full disclosure on classification: The MNP existing data has an unusual composition: 12 target product sales (mortgages) and 144 other product sales, for a total of 156. That 12:144 ratio of target-to-other is far outside the norm for other offer types and raises a legitimate question about whether some of those 144 sales involve mortgages that were attributed to a different product category. If any meaningful number of the 144 other-product sales were actually mortgages coded differently, the true existing market share could be materially higher than 4.3% — which would widen the gap and weaken the narrow-gap finding. The prospective side is less exposed to this concern, with 19 target sales and only 5 other product sales. This classification question is under separate review. The narrow gap is included here as a directional finding, not a settled conclusion.
External research suggests this is structural, not anecdotal. Independent mortgage companies now originate 63–72% of all home purchase loans (CFPB/HMDA, 2023–2024), meaning the majority of borrowers leave their primary financial institution to close a mortgage. Depositories’ share of mortgage originations has fallen from 81% to 39% over 15 years (Kansas City Fed). No other consumer lending product shows this pattern. Real estate agents influence lender choice for nearly half of home buyers, and agents recommend nonbank lenders twice as often as banks, citing speed and closing reliability (STRATMOR Group). The CFPB’s National Survey of Mortgage Borrowers found that 77% of borrowers applied with only one lender, but among those who did shop, the decision was almost entirely rate-driven—Freddie Mac found that rate dispersion across lenders doubled in 2022. Borrowers without an existing relationship have no reason to default to any institution; they are won on terms, timing, and offer. This is exactly the competitive dynamic that makes MNP different from PCL, ALR, ALE, and HCC, where the existing relationship produces a 12–25× structural moat.
Importantly, a mortgage win brings a new member inside the institution—where they enter the existing-member funnel and encounter the 12–25× campaigns going forward.
With that disclosure in view, the structural argument for MNP as an acquisition vehicle remains: home purchase is a life-event decision driven by rate and timing rather than relationship depth. Buyers comparison-shop regardless of where they bank, which should reduce the existing-member advantage relative to products where trust and convenience dominate. Whether the advantage narrows to 1.3x or somewhat more will be clearer as classification questions are resolved and as more campaign data accumulates.
Even with the classification caveat, the mortgage new purchase finding is worth acting on directionally. But the downstream logic deserves careful framing.
Oliver Wyman’s widely-cited analysis “Mortgage Cross-Sell: The Elusive Opportunity” found that for large banks, the mortgage-to-primary-relationship conversion is more assumed than achieved: primary banking relationships are sticky, most mortgage borrowers don’t consolidate their checking account with their lender, and only 10–15% of customers switch primary banks in any 18-month window. That finding applies to large commercial banks operating at arm’s length from their customers.
Credit unions are structurally different in three ways that change the arithmetic. First, credit unions predominantly portfolio their mortgage loans rather than selling them to the secondary market, which means the servicing relationship — monthly statements, escrow management, rate conversations — stays in-house for the life of the loan. Second, membership itself is a continuing engagement mechanism: once someone becomes a member to close a mortgage, they are already inside the cross-sell environment. Third, credit unions tend to service smaller geographic footprints where branch proximity and community identity reinforce the relationship in ways a national lender cannot replicate.
The hypothesis, then — supported directionally by this data but not yet proven within it — is that a prospective MNP campaign that wins a home purchase loan at or near existing-member conversion rates delivers downstream value no other prospective offer type can match. The new borrower becomes a member; the member encounters the same PCL, ALR, and HCC campaigns where existing members convert at 20–56% market share. Whether that flywheel actually closes, and at what rate, is a question this dataset cannot fully answer — but it is the right question for credit unions running MNP campaigns to measure going forward.
The rate environment reinforces the timing argument. High rates have suppressed purchase volume and reduced origination competition. Mortgages originated now become existing members for the next rate cycle — where this data consistently shows market share in the 20–56% range across personal loans, auto refinance, and home equity products.
For existing member campaigns, PCL, ALR, and ALE are the highest-confidence investments, supported by hundreds to thousands of total sales each. All three should run continuously at maximum eligible coverage. HCC belongs in the mix with appropriate precision caveats.
For prospective campaigns, MNP is the only offer type where the data — subject to the classification disclosure — suggests near-parity with existing member performance. PCL and ALR are the only other prospective products with sufficient volume to evaluate meaningfully; both convert at roughly 1/15th the existing rate, and the economics should be modeled explicitly before committing budget.
Conversion rate measures campaign activity in isolation. Market share — your closed loans divided by all loans closed in the same prescreened population — measures whether you are winning or losing relative to competitors. Only market share tells you if your competitive position is improving. Track it every campaign, every product, every segment.
Existing member campaigns outperform prospective campaigns by 12–25× across every well-evidenced product type — Personal Consolidation Loans, Auto Loan Refinance, Auto Loan Term Extensions, and HELOC Consolidation. Your members are in the market right now, and they are choosing other institutions when you don’t make an offer. Continuous existing-member coverage is the highest-return activity available to a credit union or community bank.
Prospective campaigns convert at 1/12th to 1/25th the rate of existing member campaigns — except for Mortgage New Purchase, where the gap narrows to approximately 1.3×. That exception is the acquisition entry point: win the mortgage, gain a member, then deploy the existing-member campaigns where your institution already dominates. Not every prospective offer type earns the economics; choose the ones where the data says you can compete.
Volume, conversion rate, and cost-per-acquisition are useful inputs. But the only question that answers “are we getting more competitive?” is: did our share of the prescreened market go up? Campaigns that increase market share are working. Campaigns that don’t — regardless of what conversion rate shows — are not.
Four products tell a consistent story: the existing member relationship produces 12–25x the market share of prospective campaigns. One product — mortgage new purchase — appears to be an exception, with a gap of approximately 1.3x, subject to pending classification review. That exception, if it holds, is the acquisition strategy: maximize existing member coverage on proven products, and use MNP prospective campaigns to bring in new members who will encounter those same high-converting campaigns for years — a flywheel that the Oliver Wyman research suggests is more accessible to credit unions, with their portfolio-and-service model, than to the large banks where the mortgage cross-sell thesis has historically underdelivered.
Micronotes helps credit unions and community banks run smarter prescreen campaigns — combining FCRA-compliant targeting, behavioral analytics, and campaign performance measurement to maximize market share across both existing and prospective segments.
Community FIs chasing younger demographics may be ignoring their most profitable lending prospects: engaged 55+ members. Data shows this segment drives superior loan-to-share performance when properly cultivated.
TD Bank’s billion-dollar AI strategy reveals a blueprint community FIs can follow: trust-first frameworks and human oversight turn AI-powered prescreen into a compliant growth engine. Here’s how to capture enterprise-level results without enterprise-level resources.
Community FIs win loyalty in vulnerable moments, but those interactions rarely scale. Learn how precision prescreen marketing can replicate branch-level empathy across your entire membership.
By Devon Kinkead
The credit union industry enters 2026 facing a paradox. Second-quarter 2025 data from Callahan & Associates reveals operational resilience—net interest margins climbing to 3.32% and return on assets improving—yet member growth has slowed to rates unseen in over a decade. Regional disparities are widening, with Western states thriving while parts of the Midwest and South lose members entirely. As economic uncertainty drives members to save more, credit union leaders must rethink their fundamental approach to leading organizations through complexity.
MIT Sloan Management Review’s research on the future of work offers a compelling framework for navigating these challenges—spanning employee well-being, meeting culture, toxic workplace dynamics, and organizational resilience. Each principle speaks directly to the headwinds credit unions face.
Credit unions competing for talent against larger banks and fintechs should take note of striking MIT Sloan research: employee happiness predicts exceptional performance more powerfully than any demographic factor. In a study of nearly one million U.S. Army service members tracked over five years, the happiest employees earned four times as many performance awards as the unhappiest—a finding that held across over 190 job categories and remained significant after controlling for education, experience, and background.
For credit unions watching member growth slow to 2.0% annually, investing in employee well-being isn’t a soft initiative—it’s a competitive necessity. The research identifies three actionable steps: measure happiness in hiring and ongoing assessments using validated tools, develop it through evidence-based exercises like gratitude practices and strengths identification, and retain happy employees who spread positivity throughout the organization. With core members deepening relationships and increasing average balances by $435 over the past year, frontline employee engagement directly shapes whether that momentum continues or stalls.
MIT Sloan research across 76 companies reveals a counterintuitive finding: reducing meetings by 60%—equivalent to three meeting-free days per week—increased cooperation by 55% and reduced stress by 57%. Productivity rose 73%, and satisfaction climbed 65%. Perhaps most surprisingly, communication improved rather than deteriorated as employees found better asynchronous ways to connect using project management tools and messaging platforms.
For credit unions navigating the tension between member service and operational efficiency, this offers a practical lever. With indirect lending contracting 1.2% year-over-year as cooperatives redirect resources toward organic member growth, staff need focused time to develop relationships and pursue meaningful work. The research suggests the optimal balance leaves only two days per week for meetings, preserving three for concentrated effort while maintaining essential social connections.
MIT Sloan’s analysis of over 1.3 million Glassdoor reviews identified toxic culture as the single best predictor of attrition during the Great Resignation—ten times more predictive than compensation. The researchers pinpointed five attributes that poison culture in employees’ eyes: disrespectful, noninclusive, unethical, cutthroat, and abusive environments. Notably, inclusion emerged as the most powerful predictor of whether employees view their organization as toxic.
The geographic variation in credit union member growth—strong in Utah, Oregon, and California; weak or negative in Ohio, Indiana, and South Carolina—may reflect cultural factors alongside economic ones. Credit unions in struggling markets should examine whether pockets of toxicity exist within their organizations, even if aggregate culture scores appear healthy. The research warns that measuring culture only in averages can obscure experiences that profoundly affect subsets of employees. For an industry built on cooperative values and community trust, ensuring every employee experiences those values daily is strategically essential.
As members respond to economic anxiety by increasing savings to 4.5%—the highest personal savings rate in a year—credit union employees face their own uncertainties about the future. MIT Sloan researchers caution against simply telling employees to be resilient. Instead, leaders must create environments where resilience becomes easier through shared practices, meaningful one-on-one conversations, and systems that support well-being collectively rather than placing the burden on individuals.
Practical applications include establishing team rituals that provide stability during uncertainty, using one-on-one meetings for genuine support rather than status updates, and creating shared language that makes it safe to acknowledge struggles. Since the pandemic, having a supportive manager has become the largest predictor of workplace happiness—nearly twice as important as purpose—making these leadership behaviors directly consequential for organizational performance.
The credit union industry’s 2025 performance data reveals organizations that remain operationally sound but face structural challenges requiring adaptive leadership. Net interest margins provide breathing room; declining member growth creates urgency. MIT Sloan’s research suggests that technical strategies alone won’t suffice.
The leaders who will guide their credit unions successfully through 2026 will prioritize employee happiness as a driver of exceptional performance, protect focused work time while maintaining meaningful connection, actively monitor for and address toxic microcultures, and build systems that support resilience rather than simply demanding it. For an industry founded on people helping people, this human-centered leadership framework aligns naturally with credit union identity. The question is whether leaders will embrace it with the intentionality the moment demands.
By Devon Kinkead
In an era where deposits walk at the first sign of a better rate and fintechs promise instant gratification, financial institutions face a critical question: How do you keep deposits not just for today, but for decades? The answer increasingly lies in reimagining one of banking’s oldest products—the certificate of deposit—as both a retention tool and a relationship deepener.
Two complementary approaches are reshaping how community banks and credit unions think about CDs and deposit retention: First Alliance Credit Union’s mission-driven Impact CD and Micronotes’ technology-enabled exceptional deposit strategy. Together, they reveal a powerful truth: the most effective deposit retention combines emotional connection with intelligent intervention at life’s pivotal moments.
For decades, certificates of deposit served a straightforward purpose: lock in funds at a fixed rate for a set term. But this transactional approach misses the deeper dynamics of deposit retention in today’s market.
Research shows that up to 50% of large deposits exit within 90 days without proactive intervention—a sobering reality for community institutions competing against both rate-chasing depositors and digital-first competitors. Traditional CDs, while offering rate incentives, often fail to address the underlying reasons customers move money: they don’t feel understood, they’re navigating major life events alone, or they simply don’t see their deposits making an impact beyond personal gain.
The institutions winning at deposit retention understand that every significant deposit tells a story—whether it’s an inheritance, a home sale, a business success, or a bonus. These “exceptional deposits” signal life events that require thoughtful guidance, not just product pitches. And increasingly, the most successful institutions are using CDs not merely as rate vehicles, but as relationship-building instruments that address both practical needs and deeper values.
First Alliance Credit Union’s Impact CD represents a bold reimagining of what a certificate of deposit can be. Rather than letting deposits “rest quietly in an account that compounds in silence,” this innovative product transforms member funds into visible community impact.
The Impact CD operates like a conventional certificate—offered in five-, seven-, or ten-year maturities—but with features that turn it into something more meaningful:
Transparency Through Impact Reporting: Members receive an Annual Financial and Community Impact Report tracing their deposit from vault to community outcome—whether that’s a family’s front door, a startup’s first storefront, or someone’s financial fresh start. This transparency creates an emotional connection far deeper than basis points alone.
Flexibility That Builds Relationships: Unlike traditional CDs that penalize any change, Impact CD holders can add to their principal at any time during the term without resetting the clock. This flexibility recognizes that life events—the very moments that create exceptional deposits—happen throughout a CD’s term.
Mission Alignment: Members can direct interest earnings to the First Alliance Credit Union Foundation, amplifying their impact while maintaining the safety of their principal investment.
Extended Protection: For larger balances, supplemental share protection extends deposit insurance beyond standard NCUA limits, addressing a common concern for high-balance depositors.
In just twelve months, First Alliance’s deposit strategy—anchored by the Impact CD—fueled remarkable outcomes: credit-building programs for 550+ people, affordable homes for 31 families, nearly $5 million to 55 entrepreneurs, and fair financing for 175 immigrant neighbors through ITIN loans.
President/CEO Brent Rempe describes the Impact CD as “a way to turn private prosperity into shared possibility”—a positioning that transforms deposit retention from a defensive financial strategy into an offensive relationship-building opportunity.
While First Alliance shows how purpose can retain deposits, Micronotes demonstrates how technology can identify and respond to the critical moments when deposits are most at risk—or when relationships can be most profoundly deepened.
Micronotes’ platform uses predictive analytics to identify “exceptional deposits”—statistically anomalous deposits that typically signal major life events. The moment these deposits occur, the system initiates personalized microinterviews through digital banking channels, creating conversations rather than broadcasting sales messages.
The technology addresses a fundamental insight: every large deposit represents a life event, and the window to respond is narrow. Without intervention, these deposits often leave quickly as customers navigate major transitions—home purchases, inheritances, business launches, retirement planning—often feeling overwhelmed and underserved.
The Micronotes approach transforms the CD from a passive product into an active retention tool:
Financial institutions using Micronotes’ Exceptional Deposits solution have seen dramatic results:
One community bank customer shared: “I was planning on investing into a money market with Wells Fargo at 5.4%.” With Micronotes-enabled intervention, the bank offered competitive CD products that retained the relationship.
When we combine First Alliance’s mission-driven approach with Micronotes’ technology-enabled intervention, a comprehensive CD retention strategy emerges:
Exceptional deposits are retention opportunities in disguise. Whether someone receives an inheritance, sells a home, or gets a major bonus, they’re navigating a life transition that requires financial guidance. Technology like Micronotes identifies these moments instantly, creating the opportunity for timely intervention.
The most effective retention conversations begin with empathy, not product pitches. Micronotes’ microinterview approach asks questions and listens before recommending solutions. This mirrors First Alliance’s understanding that members want to be co-authors of impact stories, not just rate shoppers.
Traditional CDs compete solely on rate and term. But modern depositors—especially those navigating significant life events—seek more. They want:
First Alliance’s annual impact reports and Micronotes’ continuous microinterview technology both recognize that deposit retention isn’t a one-time sale—it’s an ongoing conversation. CDs with longer terms (five, seven, or ten years) become relationship anchors when institutions stay engaged throughout the term.
Micronotes research emphasizes that financial decisions don’t happen in isolation—they occur within household contexts. A large deposit for a home down payment might involve parents helping children; an inheritance affects multiple generations. CDs positioned within these household relationships become stickier because they’re woven into family financial planning.
The most sophisticated institutions use technology to identify when a member’s child is approaching college age, when families might be planning for eldercare, or when multiple generations could benefit from coordinated CD laddering strategies.
How can community banks and credit unions apply these insights to transform CDs from commodity products into retention powerhouses?
Start with mission and positioning:
Deploy intelligent intervention:
Focus on these universal principles:
The convergence of mission-driven products like First Alliance’s Impact CD and technology-enabled intervention like Micronotes’ Exceptional Deposits platform points toward the future of deposit retention.
Successful institutions will:
In this future, CDs evolve from simple rate vehicles into sophisticated relationship tools that:
The certificate of deposit—one of banking’s oldest and most straightforward products—is being reinvented for the modern deposit retention challenge. Financial institutions that view CDs merely as rate-driven commodities will continue losing deposits to whoever offers 25 basis points more this month.
But institutions that follow First Alliance’s lead in creating mission-aligned CD products, combined with Micronotes’ approach to technology-enabled life event identification, will transform CDs into relationship-building instruments that retain deposits not through penalties or rate games, but through genuine understanding and shared values.
The path forward requires both heart and technology: the emotional intelligence to understand that every exceptional deposit represents a human story, and the technological capability to identify and respond to these stories at scale. When purpose meets precision, CDs become more than financial instruments—they become the foundation of multi-generational banking relationships built on trust, transparency, and shared community commitment.
The question for your institution isn’t whether to offer CDs—it’s whether your CDs are retention tools or just another rate on the board. First Alliance and Micronotes show that when you reimagine these foundational products through the lens of life events, community impact, and intelligent engagement, they become among your most powerful deposit retention strategies.
Because in the end, deposits don’t leave institutions—people do. And people stay when they feel understood, valued, and connected to something larger than basis points. That’s the true power of strategically positioned certificates of deposit in the modern deposit retention playbook.